國際之間沒有真正的朋友，只有利益的交換。”朋友”之說，只是天真的想像。而且所謂的”朋友”，極可能就是出賣你，把你推入泥沼的人。
加入北約，很可能會是瑞典日後最後悔的決定。這個決定所可能造成的後果：
1. 本來不是敵人的也變成了敵人 – 放棄中立國的地位，加入一個意見與利益各自分歧的團體，真的保障自己？普丁是個親西方的領導人，曾經很努力要加入西方的陣營，數度嘗試加入北約，但是都被美國拒絕。(美國拒絕的原因，我以後會說)
2. 犧牲本國人民的福利，用人民的稅金來替美國付帳單，替美國減少財政壓力。美國共和黨已經不願意繼續無限制地資助烏克蘭，這時候剛好有芬蘭和瑞典來幫美國出錢，讓烏克蘭人替美國繼續犧牲下去。
3. 庫德族再度被出賣，有被恐攻的隱憂，並且造成更多的種族對立。隨著芬蘭、瑞典與土耳其三國的利益交換，庫德人的建國之路更崎嶇滄桑。會採取恐怖行動的，是力量遠不平衡的弱勢一方。
4. 隨著政府財政吃緊，社會福利減少，治安有惡化的隱憂，而從烏克蘭流出的軍火，在黑市越來越多。
瑞典的媒體非常高度的親美，幾乎一切都是美國政府觀點。我不禁好奇：就算不去看其他訊息來源，難道沒有人看得出來這些新聞間的矛盾之處？難道沒有人發覺這當中明顯的雙重標準？他們思考的能力到哪裡去了？
是誰讓這場本來不應該發生的衝突發生的？
是誰逼迫讓這場衝突越來越血腥？
美國要提供集束炸彈給烏克蘭，最後這些集束炸彈會留在烏克蘭的土地上，難以清理。
同樣的，美國不賣給台灣我們需要的武器，卻要我們買連波蘭都不要買的火山布雷車。這些地雷會存在我們的土地上，而不是美國。
越戰期間美國在寮國和越南投下了2.4億顆集束彈藥，有8000萬顆殘留在那邊，直到現在依然造成當地人民的傷亡。
美國不在乎打仗打到連最後一個烏克蘭人都不剩下，他們更願意讓烏克蘭為他們流乾最後一滴血。
所以，如果台海兩岸不幸發生衝突，請北約各國高抬貴手，千萬不要插手，提供軍事武器給我們。我們不願意當北約的砲灰。
美國本來是要在亞太地區放火，2021年5月，The Economist經濟學人的封面居然是台灣，寫著”The most dangerous place on Earth”，塑造台灣海峽兩岸就要開戰的氛圍，沒想到PRC沒有上當，反而是歐洲先起火了 – 美國說要讓烏克蘭加入北約，一再拒絕俄羅斯的談判要求，最後烏克蘭集結重兵，即將對頓巴斯地區展開致命性攻擊，於是展開戰爭序幕。
亞洲許多國家都被美國出賣過，明白北約不是甚麼好東西，更知道美國才是引發俄烏戰爭的幕後黑手，所以東協和中東對於北約是抱持著冷淡甚至反對的態度。日本與韓國只有執政黨對於北約熱衷，老百姓卻在發動反北約的遊行。
這場戰爭繼續下去，恐怕會蔓延到整個歐洲；而美國天高皇帝遠，歐洲成了廢墟也不干他的事。美國政客已經得到他們想要的：
1. 選票 – 長期的冷戰思維已經成為慣性，對抗俄國是政治正確，可以移轉國內人民對於經濟下滑、基礎設施落後的不滿。
2. 軍工複合體大發利市，而這些軍火商正是政黨的大金主，這也是為什麼美國要在世界各地挑起戰爭。
3. 低價買進烏克蘭的土地、資源、礦產、農產品.
4. 北約復活，美國增加對歐洲的控制力
這些都是淺顯易見的事情，John Mearsheimer也說過這些事情，但是許多短視的人看不到，更有許多人明明知道這些道理，卻不敢說、不敢做。也幸好華盛頓聽不進John Mearsheimer 的話，亞洲才得以有和平與發展。
朋友問我幹嘛這麼擔心歐洲？戰爭留在歐洲，美國無力在亞洲興風作浪，亞洲就安全了。但是我有家人和朋友在歐洲啊！
There are no real friends between countries, only the exchange of interests. The term "friend" is just a naive imagination. And the so-called "friend" is most likely the person who betrayed you and pushed you into the mud.Joining NATO is likely to be the decision Sweden regrets most in the future. Possible consequences of this decision:
1. Giving up the status of a neutral country and creating an enemy for themselves – a group with different opinions and interests can really protect yourself? Putin was a pro-Western leader who has done a lot efforts to join the Western world. Russia even tried several times to join NATO, but was rejected by the United States. The United States has to use NATO to control European countries.
2. Sacrificing the welfare of its own people, using people's tax money to pay the bills for the United States. The Republican Party of the United States is no longer willing to continue to fund Ukraine endlessly. At this time, Finland and Sweden just "saved" the United States with money.
3. The Kurds have been betrayed again, there is a potential danger of terrorist attacks. With the exchange of interests among Finland, Sweden, and Turkey, the Kurds' situation has become more rugged.
4. As the government's finances are tight, social welfare is reduced, and public security is likely to deteriorate. Besides there are more and more arms flowing out of Ukraine to the black market.
The Swedish media is very pro-American, and almost everything is from the view of the US government. I couldn't help but wonder: Even if you don't watch/read the news from other sources, can't people see so many obvious double standard cases? Couldn't anyone see the contradictory parts in these news? Where is the ability to think?
Who made this conflict happen when it shouldn't have happened?
Who is forcing this conflict to become more and more bloody?
The United States will provide cluster bombs to Ukraine. In the end, these cluster bombs will remain on Ukrainian soil and it will be difficult to clean them up.
Similarly, the United States does not sell Taiwan the weapons we need, but asks us to buy volcanic mine vehicles that even Poland does not want to buy. These mines will be on our soil, not America.
During the Vietnam War, the United States dropped 240 million cluster munitions on Laos and Vietnam, and 80 million remained there, causing casualties to the local people until now.
The United States does not care about fighting until there is not even the last Ukrainian left. They prefer to let Ukraine shed the last drop of blood for them.
Therefore, if there is an unfortunate conflict between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, NATO countries should hold their hands high and never intervene and provide us with military weapons. We don't want to be cannon fodder for NATO.
The United States was going to set fire to the Asia-Pacific region. In May 2021, the cover of The Economist turned out to be Taiwan, with the words "The most dangerous place on Earth", creating an atmosphere that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait were about to go to war. Unexpectedly, the PRC did not It was fooled, but it was Europe that started the fire first - the United States said that it would let Ukraine join NATO, and repeatedly rejected Russia's negotiating request. Finally, Ukraine assembled heavy troops and was about to launch a fatal attack on the Donbass region, thus starting the prelude to the war.
Many Asian countries have been used and betrayed by the United States and learned not to be so naive. Many people in Asia know that the United States is the behind-the-scenes hand that triggered the Russia-Ukraine war. Therefore, ASEAN and the Middle East hold a cold or even opposed attitude towards NATO. In Japan and South Korea, only the ruling parties are enthusiastic about NATO, but not ordinary people. There are were demonstrations against NATO.
If the war becomes out of control, the battles might spread to other European countries. The US is far away from there, they can suck more blood from Europe. American politicians have gotten what they want:
1. Votes – The long-term Cold War mentality has become a habit in Americans' mind, and it is always politically correct to confront Russia, which can divert people's dissatisfaction with domestic situation like economic decline and backward infrastructure.
2. The military-industrial complex is booming, and these arms dealers are the big funders of political parties, which is why the United States wants to provoke wars around the world.
3. Buy Ukraine's land, resources, minerals, and agricultural products at low prices.
4. With the resurrection of NATO, the United States increases its control over Europe.
These are obvious things. I believe that many people clearly know these truths, but dare not say or do something for it. Fortunately (for us), Washington did not listen to John Mearsheimer's words, and Asia is able to enjoy peace and development.
My friends asked me why I am so worried about Europe? If the war stays in Europe and the United States won't have the ability to stir up trouble in Asia, and Asia will be safe. But I have family and friends in Europe, I have to try to wake them up, no matter whether it works. I know it's impossible to wake up those who pretends sleeping though.
---------------
從地緣政治來說，中國的崛起對美國的威脅不是最大的，美國最怕的是歐洲團結一體化，特別是俄羅斯和法德團結起來，那就沒美國什麼事了，這才是美國最大的噩夢。所以這麼多年，美國拼了命的要去打壓肢解俄羅斯。From a geopolitical point of view, the rise of China is not the greatest threat to the United States. What the United States is most afraid of is the unity and integration of Europe, especially the unity of Russia, France and Germany. It's USA's nightmare. That's why the United States has so many soldiers in Germany and tries its best to suppress and dismember Russia.
留言列表
