我弟弟推薦這部電影給我,我也要推薦這部電影給大家。有人說打仗了還能正常上班上課?My brother recommended this movie to me, and I want to recommend it to everyone. It absolutely must be shown to those naive fools who think war is just like playing a computer game, so they can see what real war actually is. This is urban warfare. And the U.S. still wants us to fight urban warfare!Some people are saying that even when a war breaks out, you can still go to work and attend classes as usual?一定要給那些認為戰爭就跟打電腦遊戲一樣的天真蠢蛋看一下,什麼是真實的戰爭。這就是城鎮戰。美國還要我們打城鎮戰呢!這才是戰爭的真正樣貌。電影裡鬱金香和152mm自走砲,都是蘇聯設計製造的武器。連使用的槍械也是,戰術也差不多,所以電影裡說"像是自己打自己" -- 這也是許多從戰場回來的俄軍的感想。令人感觸良多的是這一段:"我爺爺打到柏林可不是為了讓我向你投降的",而另一位也回"我的爺爺也去過柏林"這兩句台詞相當震撼祖父輩明明一同奮鬥的戰友,兩邊也同為東斯拉夫人,但是如今即便同為"白軍"(非蘇聯的共產部隊)
- 12月 18 週四 202513:56
極佳極寫實的戰爭片-地獄尖兵(Luchshiye v adu)
- 7月 27 週日 202522:35
美國為何無條件支持以色列?從敘利亞HTS被以色列攻擊說起
https://www.youtube.com/live/RQReEUz4spo?si=8snK8mqTGTBiqVdE
敘利亞-- 弱小卻位置重要的國家,是否會走向分崩離析、不復存在?
敘利亞-- 弱小卻位置重要的國家,是否會走向分崩離析、不復存在?
- 7月 20 週日 202518:17
台灣在漢光演習中的角色與美國戰略設計下的「工具化趨勢」
China is our sibling, not enemy. There is no need to defend against them. 俄烏戰爭中,俄方曾留出合理時間讓烏政府疏散平民,甚至派出遊覽車協助疏散;而在美國、以色列或北約的許多空襲行動中,往往缺乏事前通知就採取高密度打擊,導致大規模平民死亡。
在美國顧問主導下的2025年漢光演習,幾乎沒有搭配任何真正有效的疏散演練,或實際運作的民間避難計畫。「先打後撤」的模擬,等同於默認讓平民被困戰場、任憑波及,甚至成為軍事策略上的「肉盾」。從演習邏輯可以清楚看出,美方根本不是在幫台灣自保,而是準備把台灣變成「烏克蘭 2.0」,一個對抗中國的前線代理戰場。
During the Russia-Ukraine war, the Russian side at times left reasonable windows for the Ukrainian government to evacuate civilians, even sending buses to assist with the process. In contrast, many airstrikes carried out by the United States, Israel, or NATO have often lacked prior warning and involved high-density bombing, resulting in large-scale civilian casualties.
In the 2025 Han Kuang military exercises—led primarily by U.S. advisers—there was virtually no effective civilian evacuation drill, nor any functioning civil shelter or evacuation system in place. The simulation followed a “strike first, retreat later” model, which effectively assumes that civilians will be trapped on the battlefield, exposed to crossfire, and even used—whether intentionally or not—as human shields.
The logic behind these exercises makes it clear: the U.S. is not genuinely helping Taiwan defend itself. Rather, it is preparing to turn Taiwan into “Ukraine 2.0”—a frontline proxy battleground to counter China.
先不提今(2025年)漢光演習項目的荒腔走板之處,2025 年的演習呈現出一個令人擔憂的趨勢:明顯忽略了平民保護與疏散制度的演練機制。
在美國顧問主導下的2025年漢光演習,幾乎沒有搭配任何真正有效的疏散演練,或實際運作的民間避難計畫。「先打後撤」的模擬,等同於默認讓平民被困戰場、任憑波及,甚至成為軍事策略上的「肉盾」。從演習邏輯可以清楚看出,美方根本不是在幫台灣自保,而是準備把台灣變成「烏克蘭 2.0」,一個對抗中國的前線代理戰場。
During the Russia-Ukraine war, the Russian side at times left reasonable windows for the Ukrainian government to evacuate civilians, even sending buses to assist with the process. In contrast, many airstrikes carried out by the United States, Israel, or NATO have often lacked prior warning and involved high-density bombing, resulting in large-scale civilian casualties.
In the 2025 Han Kuang military exercises—led primarily by U.S. advisers—there was virtually no effective civilian evacuation drill, nor any functioning civil shelter or evacuation system in place. The simulation followed a “strike first, retreat later” model, which effectively assumes that civilians will be trapped on the battlefield, exposed to crossfire, and even used—whether intentionally or not—as human shields.
The logic behind these exercises makes it clear: the U.S. is not genuinely helping Taiwan defend itself. Rather, it is preparing to turn Taiwan into “Ukraine 2.0”—a frontline proxy battleground to counter China.
先不提今(2025年)漢光演習項目的荒腔走板之處,2025 年的演習呈現出一個令人擔憂的趨勢:明顯忽略了平民保護與疏散制度的演練機制。
- 6月 27 週五 202519:34
從防禦同盟到地緣棋子:歐洲的戰略危機 From Alliance to Pawn: Europe’s Strategic Decline

Modern NATO is no longer merely a defensive military alliance; it has evolved into a political and military instrument through which the United States exercises strategic control over Europe. While it presents itself as a guardian of "collective security," in practice, it primarily serves the entrenched interests of Washington’s political class and the U.S. military-industrial complex. By constantly manufacturing enemies—first the Soviet Union during the Cold War, now Russia and China—NATO sustains an endless cycle of tension that justifies ever-growing military budgets, arms sales, and foreign interventions.
Europe, as the geographic core of NATO and a subordinate ally of the U.S., is steadily losing its ability to exercise independent strategic judgment. The Russia–Ukraine war, which might have been defused through diplomacy, was instead escalated—under the influence of American media narratives and political pressure—into a proxy battle framed as a clash between “democracy and authoritarianism.” European nations were compelled to pour resources into Ukraine, while facing economic stagnation and an energy crisis at home. Under U.S. pressure, many are now raising defense spending to 2%, even 5% of GDP—sacrificing social welfare and domestic development in the process.
What is most alarming is that the United States bears none of the direct consequences of this war. It profits handsomely—through record energy exports, booming arms sales, and capital inflows—while Europe is left with a weakened economy, diminished strategic autonomy, and an eroded capacity to lead in diplomacy. As NATO drifts ever further from its original purpose, Europe must urgently reassess its role; otherwise, it risks becoming expendable in America's broader geopolitical chessboard. This is no longer just a matter of security—it is a matter of sovereignty and dignity.
當代北約(NATO)已不再僅是一個防禦性軍事聯盟,而是成為美國對歐洲施加戰略控制的政治與軍事工具。它的存在,表面上是為了捍衛「集體安全」,實則長期服務於美國國內的軍工複合體與華府政客的利益結構。透過將敵人「製造出來」,北約不斷拉高區域緊張情勢,從冷戰時期的蘇聯、到21世紀的俄羅斯與中國,永遠有一個「敵人」需要軍費、軍售與介入。
歐洲,作為北約的地理主體與美國的從屬盟友,在這種結構下不斷失去自主戰略判斷的能力。以俄烏戰爭為例,本是可以透過外交途徑緩和的區域衝突,卻在美國媒體與政治操作下,被擴大為「民主與專制」的決戰戰場。歐洲國家不僅被迫提供大量援烏資源,還面對自身經濟衰退與能源危機,卻仍在美國壓力下調高軍費至GDP的2%、甚至5%以上,進一步犧牲社福與民生發展。
值得警惕的是,美國不會為歐洲負責任地承擔戰爭後果。它從衝突中獲利:天然氣銷售、武器輸出、資本回流,而歐洲則失去經濟韌性、戰略空間與對話主導權。當北約的行動愈來愈偏離其原初宗旨,歐洲若不反思自身角色,最終恐將淪為美國地緣博弈中的「消耗品」。這不僅是安全問題,更是主權與尊嚴的流失。
寫這麼多,其實可以濃縮為一小段:
北約是美國對歐洲的控制棒,存在的原因是服務那些政客和軍工複合體,讓他們有收不盡的利益,並且確保美國在西方世界的領導者地位。這也就是為什麼他們要在世界各地搧風點火、挑亂生戰。 寫這麼多,其實可以濃縮為一小段:
北約是美國對歐洲的控制棒,存在的原因是服務那些政客和軍工複合體,讓他們有收不盡的利益,並且確保美國在西方世界的領導者地位。這也就是為什麼他們要在世界各地搧風點火、挑亂生戰。
I’ve written so much, but it can actually be condensed into a short statement:
NATO is a tool for the United States to control Europe. Its very existence serves the interests of politicians and the military-industrial complex, allowing them to reap endless profits while ensuring the U.S. maintains its leadership in the Western world. This is also why they stir up tensions and provoke conflicts around the world.
- 7月 24 週一 202301:34
戰略家承認西方正在煽動中國發動戰爭
Strategists admit West is goading China into war
By Nury Vittachi and Phill Hynes https://agonyofsorrow.pixnet.net/blog/post/45497459
By Nury Vittachi and Phill Hynes https://agonyofsorrow.pixnet.net/blog/post/45497459
- 7月 20 週四 202300:25
瑞典傻加入北約
國際之間沒有真正的朋友,只有利益的交換。”朋友”之說,只是天真的想像。而且所謂的”朋友”,極可能就是出賣你,把你推入泥沼的人。
加入北約,很可能會是瑞典日後最後悔的決定。這個決定所可能造成的後果:
加入北約,很可能會是瑞典日後最後悔的決定。這個決定所可能造成的後果:
- 7月 18 週一 202212:08
被消失的文章-為什麼烏克蘭已經輸掉這場戰爭?
本文翻譯自2022/3/21 Larry C. Johnson 接受 Mike Whitney的專訪,原文刊登於 UNZ Review,
原本網址在此,自從2022/7/13就一直在"維護中"的狀態
另外補充Jacques Baud的「烏克蘭的軍事情境」:http://ccp.twmedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/傳播文化與政治第15期.pdf
原本網址在此,自從2022/7/13就一直在"維護中"的狀態
另外補充Jacques Baud的「烏克蘭的軍事情境」:http://ccp.twmedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/傳播文化與政治第15期.pdf
- 7月 11 週一 202216:41
DONBASS-等待俄羅斯的救贖
很真實,也很驚心動魄的紀錄片,請小心觀看。
A very real and thrilling documentary. I watched it couple years ago.
我老公問我:難道你認為烏克蘭應該割讓一部分國土嗎?
我的回答是:這不是割讓,既然烏克蘭不愛這些人,對他們展開屠殺、迫害、文化滅絕,那就放他們自由吧!
https://youtu.be/6Oh-IE2zmJc
這裡有中文字幕:
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Z3411V727/
DONBASS - Zeke asked me whether I think Ukraine should lose a part of their terriory, my answe is: since Ukraine doesn't like those people, it's better to let them become independent.
People there have suffered so much in the past 8 years - oppression, slaughter, genocide and cultural genocide. They fought for themselves bravely. Since Russia comes to help them, that's good to set them free.
A very real and thrilling documentary. I watched it couple years ago.
我老公問我:難道你認為烏克蘭應該割讓一部分國土嗎?
我的回答是:這不是割讓,既然烏克蘭不愛這些人,對他們展開屠殺、迫害、文化滅絕,那就放他們自由吧!
https://youtu.be/6Oh-IE2zmJc
這裡有中文字幕:
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Z3411V727/
DONBASS - Zeke asked me whether I think Ukraine should lose a part of their terriory, my answe is: since Ukraine doesn't like those people, it's better to let them become independent.
People there have suffered so much in the past 8 years - oppression, slaughter, genocide and cultural genocide. They fought for themselves bravely. Since Russia comes to help them, that's good to set them free.
- 5月 18 週三 202216:05
CNN報導說俄軍射殺烏克蘭平民
- 5月 13 週五 202215:32
【烏克蘭版的228】
【烏克蘭版的228】https://reurl.cc/7Dkb3y
https://twitter.com/Youblacksoul/status/1513930372454699011?s=20&t=Itf0ur-cPasBw0jWrirDCw
https://twitter.com/Youblacksoul/status/1513930372454699011?s=20&t=Itf0ur-cPasBw0jWrirDCw
