這樣的教材，難怪會教出一堆無知自大的井底蛙。 話說退出京都議定書跟巴黎協定的是哪個國家？ 人均碳排最高的國家是哪些？ 我真懷疑這些課本和講義是不是大紀元新唐人法輪功寫的了.....
https://www.facebook.com/ihsiu.su/posts/984285515405704
線上支付的部分，中國的線下服務還沒發展起來，線上服務就取代線下服務了。日本與台灣的線下服務在智慧型手機普及以前就發展完成，以至於線上服務的必需性大減。這就像在非州國家，不少人只有手機沒有市話；但在台灣或日本，至少大家家裡有電話一樣。日本跟台灣一些公司到現在還在用傳真機呢!!
另一個角度來看，今後的方向肯定是往線上發展的，只是時機的問題。
而且，如果按照這課本和講義所說，那麼莫非台灣偽鈔多、ATM不普遍?
https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/977b5339-f3a1-4882-9935-1f7ca0c075e0?fbclid=IwAR27ADEqtdUJhcoOP4hdSFBjT7rty7uicgI5tiHl_-uh0u7OGDZZAiwYPao
關於碳排與塵霾的問題，大家可以先看這個影片：
這個視頻裡面說的好，中國是世界工廠，你抱怨中國製造汙染，但是事實上是中國幫你承擔了這些汙染。
就像上回我搭機遇到的德國人，我們提到綠能，我對他說：當你享用所謂的"潔淨能源"時，你要知道，你只是把汙染丟在別人家。
可以歸納為以下幾點：
1. The US needs a constant series of enemies to distract the populace from the evil perpetuated against them by the 1% who own the Federal Reserve, Wall Street and the military industrial complex. China's massive investment in infrastructure, public education and poverty eradication has made them the thought leader in sustainable products and technologies. They are soon going to pass us in research scientists, international standards proposed and patents filed. Soon they are going to go from the manufacturing leader to the TECHNOLOGY innovation leader, and with that, the US position as world hegemon and reserve currency is over. They may be a massively repressive and undemocratic regime, but they are unified and directed toward a comprehensive VISION, while the only aim our current leadership seem to have is to squeeze every dollar out of its working and middle classes. Creating a neoliberal capitalist feudalism is a losing proposition, compared to educating and enriching your people.
Creating fear and hatred of "the other" is America's way of justifying its insanely profitable and cancerous military industrial and fossil fuel empires. Our capitalism is BASED on dominance and subjugation, not cooperation and trade, thus every problem is a nail to be driven down by the hammer of militarism.
2.The Great Smog of 1952 is believed to have caused as many as 4,500 deaths in one week at its peak and around 12,000 in the following months. The West therefore should be very careful when chastising China (and other emerging economies) over their pollution levels at the risk of being guilty of double standards.
3.China has increased its forest cover from just 12% to 23% over the last 40 years. When one takes into consideration that of China’s national frontier stretches some 9.6 square million kilometres, about the size of the United States. In other words, China has planted just over 1 million square kilometres of forest. That is the size of Egypt!
In perspective, trees renew our air supply by absorbing carbon dioxide and producing oxygen. The amount of oxygen produced by one square kilometre of trees per year equals the amount consumed by 4,500 people annually. One tree produces nearly 260 pounds of oxygen each year. One square kilometre of trees removes up to 640 tons of CO2 each year.
China is inarguably the most successful country in world to reverse the seemingly unstoppable desertification, by turning its desserts into forest, farm lands, and wetlands. The area of desertified land in the country is dropping by an annual average of more than 2,400 square kilometres, or 3 times the size of Singapore, compared to what used to be an annual average expansion of over 10,000 square kilometres at the end of the last century.
By 2014, China had completed and commissioned its mid-line stretch of the South-North Water Diversion Project. This 1,300 kilometres dedicated, largely gravitational-flow, water supply channel diverts water from the Danjiangkou Reservoir in the upper reaches of the Han River, passing through mountains; crossing rivers; and finally reaching and transferring 9.5 billion cu meters of water annually to Beijing and Tianjin.
To put that into perspective, the annual per capita water consumption of the Asian cities: Tokyo, Singapore, Seoul, and Hong Kong are at 84, 52, 104, and 80 cu meters per annum respectively; with the average consumption of 80 cu meters per annum. In other words, the amount of water transfer annually is adequate to sustain an urban population of over 110 million people with clean and potable water.
In fact, China’s progress in environmental technology is so extensive and comprehensive that it accounted for a staggering 68% of all patents filed in 2018.
中國大陸人均碳排量遠低於美國等國家，而且 #東亞最高的人均排碳地區是台灣和韓國。
台灣人均碳排高的主因是產業結構，工業產生大量的溫室氣體
死不用核四，卻拼命燒煤、燒油、燒天然氣。
老舊的燃煤、燃油機組不淘汰，反而還延役；阻擋無碳排的核能，先進的核四不使用，核二核三卻開到底，連核電廠的備用燃油機組都拿來發電，台灣人均碳排表現很差，在減碳方面更是全球倒數第三名。
以台電開放資料顯示
104年用煤量 24.501 百萬公噸
105年用煤量 26.164 百萬公噸
106年用煤量 28.975 百萬公噸
107年用煤量 29.009 百萬公噸
105年起連續三年 每年相對於104年 增加用煤量 累積 超過10.363 百萬頓（3年累積用煤84.148百萬噸）
根據能源統計月報
(1)台電燃煤發電量108年1~9月為57338.6百萬度較去年同期【增加】了2.91%，
(2)但相對乾淨的天然氣台電自發電量卻是減少了9.39%。
(3)然後再向IPP增加購入氣電5.89%，
(4)最後吶喊虧損84億，
這會不會也太逗了吧。
有這樣的結果不意外啊!!!
#用癌發電
https://e-info.org.tw/node/221893
大陸網友對這教材的評論是：台湾的课本带有明显的政治倾向，有点像60，70年代的大陆课本。我有个奇怪的想法，是不是华人圈里，只要是经济相对比较落后的政权，是否都有愚民的习惯呢？
留言列表
