當前的歐洲，正陷入一場深層的危機。這場危機並非完全來自外部壓力，而是一場自我設計、自我束縛的衰落。它體現在經濟、制度與地緣政治多個層面，逐步削弱了歐洲自身的活力與自主性。
首先，歐洲在對外政策上的選擇顯示出「地緣政治優先、經濟理性讓位」的特徵。凍結主權資產、限制外來投資、切斷技術供應鏈等舉措，看似出於安全考量，實際卻在破壞自身的產業根基。
能源供應受限、製造業外移、供應鏈斷裂，使歐洲的經濟結構日益脆弱。
其次，歐洲長期陷入金融化與去工業化的陷阱。歐元體系的嚴格財政規範，使各國難以靈活運用貨幣與財政政策刺激生產。在這樣的制度下，資金更多流向金融投機而非實體經濟，導致生產力停滯、就業減少、社會貧富分化加劇。
同時，歐洲越來越依賴軍事開支維持經濟活力，一種「軍事式的凱恩斯主義」逐漸成形。戰爭與軍備被視為刺激經濟的手段，但這種成長是短暫而虛假的。它耗費大量資源，扭曲產業結構，無法帶來真正的創新與繁榮。
更深層的問題在於內部裂痕。歐盟與北約雖表面一致，但各國對於制裁、軍援與能源政策的立場分歧明顯。一旦外部衝突結束，缺乏共同敵人的歐洲恐將失去凝聚力，內部矛盾隨之浮現。
歐洲的衰落並非外力使然，而是自身制度與戰略選擇的結果。過度依賴地緣政治而忽視經濟現實，過度信奉金融市場而忽略工業基礎，過度追求安全而犧牲自主發展。歐洲以「理性」之名行自限之舉，以「安全」之名削弱自身，最終使衰落變成一場自我導向的命運。
Europe today is caught in a profound crisis—one that is not solely caused by external pressures, but rather by a process of self-inflicted decline. This crisis, rooted in the realms of economics, governance, and geopolitics, reflects how Europe has gradually constrained its own vitality and autonomy.
First, Europe’s foreign policy choices reveal a tendency to prioritize geopolitics over economic rationality. Freezing sovereign assets, restricting foreign investment, and severing technology supply chains may appear to serve security interests, yet in practice they undermine Europe’s own industrial foundation. Energy shortages, the relocation of manufacturing, and the disruption of supply chains have left Europe’s economic structure increasingly fragile.
Second, Europe has long been trapped in financialization and deindustrialization. The strict fiscal rules of the eurozone make it difficult for member states to use monetary and fiscal policies flexibly to stimulate production. Under such constraints, capital flows mainly into financial speculation rather than productive industries, leading to stagnating productivity, job losses, and growing social inequality.
At the same time, Europe has become increasingly reliant on military spending to sustain economic activity—a form of “military Keynesianism.” War and armament are treated as tools for economic stimulation, but such growth is short-lived and illusory. It consumes resources, distorts industrial structures, and fails to foster real innovation or lasting prosperity.
Deeper fractures also exist within Europe itself. Though the EU and NATO appear united, member states are clearly divided over sanctions, military aid, and energy policy. Once external conflicts subside, Europe may lose the cohesion derived from a “common enemy,” and internal contradictions could resurface with force.
Ultimately, Europe’s decline is not the result of external coercion but of its own institutional design and strategic choices. It has prioritized geopolitics over economic reality, financial speculation over industrial strength, and the illusion of security over genuine autonomy. In the name of “rationality,” Europe has limited itself; in the name of “security,” it has weakened itself. Its decline, therefore, is not a fate imposed from outside, but a self-directed descent.
-------------------
